Tamron 28 75 vs Sony 24 105 low light

Free 2-day Shipping On Millions of Items. No Membership Fee. Shop Now Has full-time manual focus. Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS. Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III RXD. With full-time manual focus, you can move the focus ring whilst it is in AF (autofocus) mode. This means that you can make manual adjustments once the AF has finished, without changing to manual mode. 5. minimum focus distance I just bought the 24-105. Haven't received it yet. For me, 24-105, no question! Why: 24mm, 105mm (and 85 and 90), OSS, super sharp at all FLs and apertures into the corners and the rest of the optical performance is at a very high level (said as a Leica nad Zeiss prime fan). Advantages of the Tamron: f/2.8 and 160 grams lighter

Tamron Af 28-75 Sony Sold Direct On eBay - Fantastic Prices On Tamron Af 28-75 Son

Tamron Camera Lenses - Save On Tamron Camera Lense

Introduction The Tamron 2.8/28-75 Di III RXD is the first third party E-Mount autofocus zoom lens. I am excited about this lens because it defines a milestone for the E-Mount system: until now, we only had a choice between Sony's budget line, Samyang and the other (super-)expensive Sony/Zeiss options. The three classic third party manufacturers Continue reading Long Term Review: Tamron. From a Tamron 28-75 to the 24-105L.... I was getting cramped at both ends. 24 from a 28 was quite a difference and similarly moving from 75 to 105 means you have a more versatile walkaround lens. I do miss the f/2.8 sometimes, but with IS, low light shots are not a problem. Very rarely though as the problem is more with moving subjects in low. The Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 is pictured above beside the Sony 24-105mm f/4. The Tamron has a narrower barrel but is slightly longer. When extended, the Sony 24-105 extends a bit longer. The Tamron weighs less than the Sony 24-105mm F/4, 550 grams compared to 663 grams, an appreciable difference The Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 Di III RXD is the first step in Tamron's strategy to bring more lenses to the market for full-frame mirrorless cameras, such as the Sony A7R III, Sony A7 III or Sony A9. The Tamron 28-75 mm F/2.8 Di III RXD is designed for excellent image quality and beautiful background blur (bokeh)

The Tamron 28-200mm shares many design cues with the rest of the Tamron lineup for E-mount. At first glance, it looks just like the 28-75mm, with the addition of a lock switch for the zoom ring. The lens that shines out in this area is the Sony 24mm F1.4 GM which delivers outstanding performances on the A7RIV, followed closely by the Zeiss Loxia 25mm F2.4 and the Tamron 24mm F2.8 Di III OSD M 1:2 (F051). In the classical 24-70mm F2.8 category the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art & Sigma 28-70 F2.8 DG DN Contemporary outperforms both Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM and Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III. Yes, it is. Read the whole article. It has been updated. Honestly, if you wanna buy a zoom lens for sony mount E just get Tamron 28-75 or sony 24-105. Sony didn't invest much in cropped sensor lenses. They're not the best. It's better to buy FF lenses so many someday when we update camera body we have good lenses already The Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di Lens' AF is noisy and somewhat slow. More concerning is the 28-75's difficulty in locking focus in low light/low contrast situations. My Canon 17-40mm f/4 L USM Lens quickly focus-locked in situations where the Tamron only hunted. FTM (Full Time Manual) focusing is not on the 28-75's feature list The Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 lens is a contemporary of a design produced by every other major lens manufacturer. The zoom range would qualify it as a wide angle to short telephoto on a film body, but.

Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS vs Tamron 28-75mm f/2

Tamron 28-75 VS. Sony 28-70 (kitlens) comparisation? swedeshutter 0: swedeshutter 8 months ago What is the AF performance with Sony a7(mark 1) Santanu.Bandyopadhyay 1: dima.james 2 years ago new version 3 firmware update available: phopas 0: phopas 2 years ago With Sony A7: laumel The Tamron 35-150mm f/2.8-4 lens is a solid performer all around, with excellent image quality and stabilization, and a useful zoom range. The combination of the lens's large apertures and image stabilization make the lens a great choice for shooting in low light situations, and the optics and coatings are good enough to handle strong back. The Sony 28-75 F2.8, won't match up to the build of the higher priced Zeiss pro lens, and SAM is not SSM. Not going to 24mm, makes the lens more compact, and lighter. If you can get one at a discounted price, it's a better alternative to than the Tamron, both in build and focusing speed and accuracy With my Sony Alpha 7III I use it as a good-for-everything trans-standard lens when I want to travel light, or for portrait / studio when I need more flexibility than with 50mm F1.8 or 85 F1.8. Less precise focusing I noticed than the (Sony) 85 F 1.8 but that might be the case with any F4 or F5.6 lens Di III. 18-400mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II HLD. Model B028 >. Di II. See Featured Products and Highlights. Among our most lauded products are our mirrorless lenses, such as the Tamron A036 designed for Sony E-Mount cameras. And our award-winning DSLR lenses are perfectly compatible with mirrorless cameras when using the manufacturer adapter

24-105 G vs Tamron 28-75?: Sony Alpha Full Frame E-mount

  1. From a specifications perspective the Sigma 28-70 is the most compact, light and with a price only 10% higher than the Tamron and 30% less than the Sigma 24-70. The build quality of the Sigma 28-70 is in line with the Sigma 24-70 Art and better than the Tamron. It offers also better control with a AF/MF button
  2. I'm really glad that I went with the 28-75 Tamron. I considered the 24-105, but money and f4 max aperture steered me away. I use a 450D with my lenses for now, and the max ISO is 1600. I really need to expose to the right to get usable images at 800 or 1600 ISO, so I really appreciate the f2.8 vs. f4 max aperture
  3. That's why I got Sony's 24-105/4 instead. For shallow DoF or low light, I'll switch to a prime. F2.8 just doesn't do enough for me compared to f4 in low light, and I shoot my corporate portraits.

The very best, however, is the money for value. You get the Tamron 28-75 for less than 850 euros. To the Tamron lens on Amazon. The premium zoom: Sony 24-70 mm, f/2.8. Our tip for maximium quality! The best, but also most expensive, choice among the zoom lenses for the Alpha 7 series is the 24-70 mm G Master lens with an aperture of f/2.8 And I'll add a different recommendation: Tamron's 28-75/2.8 FE. I recommend trying before buying or ensuring a return avenue, but the lens really fits the 'run and gun in low-light' niche that Sony themselves hasn't yet addressed I own an A7iii and the Tamron 28-70 2.8. I love this lens. I don't own the meta bones but do have the sigma MC-11 adaptor. I borrowed the 24-70 Canon lens and found the Tamron more responsive for autofocus. Both take great pics but I had to fuss w.. The lens features a constant f/2.8 across all focal range, making it great for low light situations. It's also got a quiet autofocus motor. While the Tamron 28-75 mm f/2.8 is explicitly made for Sony E mount cameras, it can fit cropped APS-C cameras with a 42-112.5 mm equivalent focal length range When Tamron announced the new FE 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III RXD, it sent a wave of excitement throughout the Sony user base.When Tamron announced that the lens would only be $799, most of those Sony.

Tamron 28-75 F2.8 vs Sony 24-105 F4 Which is better ..

Lenses for Sony a7III Comparison Table. 1. Best Overall - Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 Di III RXD. If you've got room in your budget for a single lens after purchasing the A7III, Tamron's 28-75mm F/2.8 Di III RXD is the one to get. It's the most responsive and versatile lens on review, and its price is reasonable to boot - Good for low light conditions - Crisp images: 8. Sigma 271965 70mm F2.8 Art DG Macro - Rugged - Precise Focusing ability - Has a beautiful bokeh: 9. Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 - Great image quality and colors - Beautiful bokeh - Good range: 10. Sony FE 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 G OSS - Crisp images - Can be used even without a tripod. im almost fully sold on 24-105 f4 fo an all arounder but need a $1k ish or below solution for low light fast moving subjects like track athletes. 85 1.8 is the best overall option ~$500 roughly. Tamron is still working on the 70 - 180 F2.8 as well Hoping you can recommend a few good lenses for shooting video, mostly 3 light interviews. I have the A7iii and A9 and have been using a Sony 85 1.8 along with the Tamron 17-28 2.8. Also own Sony 70-200 2.8, 90mm macro and Tamron 28-75 2.8. Considering adding the Sony 55mm 1.8 or one of the Tamron primes. Any thoughts appreciated. Repl Furthermore, it's fast enough for low-light and subject isolation. Once you get used to fast apertures, it becomes painful to feel the constraint of slower glass. While f/2.8 obviously isn't going to do as well in low light as f/1.2, it's still plenty fast, and a fast 24-70 will have a fast 2.8 aperture throughout the entire focal range

Express your vision in intimate detail an f/2.8 high-speed zoom made for Sony full-frame mirrorless packing cutting-edge technology into a compact body, Tamron has created a high-speed zoom lens specifically designed for Sony mirrorless cameras: the 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III rxd (model a036). a great addition to the Sony E-Mount, the a036 strikes a. Summary The Tamron 28-200mm f2.8-5.6 Di III is a small and light all-in-one zoom designed for mirrorless cameras with full-frame sensors. At the time of writing, it was only available in Sony E-mount, and costs more in some regions than Sony's own FE 24-240mm super-zoom, while lacking its broader zoom range and optical stabilization Blending a sleek form-factor with a versatile working range, the 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III RXD from Tamron is a full-frame-compatible lens for Sony E-mount mirrorless cameras. Spanning wide-angle to portrait-length, a constant f/2.8 maximum aperture complements this range and affords increased control over depth of field along with enhanced low-light performance Sony FE 55mm f1.8 ZA review The Sony FE 55mm f1.8 ZA from 2013 is a very successful standard lens: small, light, sharp across a 42MP full-frame sensor, with excellent resistance against flare and glare in adverse contra-light situations It may only offer an f1.8 focal ratio but its slightly longer 55mm focal length compensates a bit when it comes to background isolation

The Best Travel Zooms For Sony FE Full-Frame Tamron 28

Sony FE 24-105/4 G Votes: 25 41.7% Tamron 28-75/2.8 Votes: 22 36 I liked both, but ended up always going back to the 2.8 for its low light ability and subject separation. I also shoot an occasional event/wedding where the IQ, low light ability, and bokeh are all nice features to have. The Sony version of the Tamron 28-75 is different. The recently released Tamron FE 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III RXD looks to be an exciting alternative to the Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS. The new Tamron lens's focal range is indeed more limited, but it does have a one-stop aperture advantage and a weather-sealed body at 2/3 of the price It's notably heavier than the Tamron (1.21 lb / 550 g), and while it's similar in length, the girth is where it brings its chunk. As the spine of the trinity of fast zooms, the 24-70mm f/2.8 is. Though it's not the cheapest lens on this list, the Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 XR Di LD is certainly the best bang for your buck and a great alternative to some of the more expensive full frame lenses. Aside from the price, the Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 XR Di LD greatest strengths are its size and image quality

Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 VS Sony 24-105 f/4.0 - FM Forum

  1. A7III + Tamron 28-75/2.8 (decent in lowlight, limited range) + GM 24/1.4 (very good for general shots, kinda expensive) or A7III + Sony 24-105/4 (and sell the Tamron, great range, less good in low light) + 55/1.8 (good indoors, but kinda short) Which would you choose
  2. I owned Tamron 28-75 F2.8 before. But I struggled with the flare and a busy boke background with Tamron. After I switch to this SEL24-105 F4 G OSS, there is no flare and acceptable bokeh. People might concern about an aperture F4 compared to F2.8. But it is just a 1 stop (2.8 -> 3.2 -> 3.5 -> 4.0) and this lens F4 has a smoother bokeh than.
  3. Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L II USM (Amazon, B&H) - the low-light legend, and it works great as a general-purpose walk-around lens. Canon EF 11-24mm f/4L USM (Amazon, B&H) - the wide-angle version, though it doesn't have IBIS the image quality is superior in every which way. Please remember, all the lenses have been picked to resolve a 6K sensor
  4. Tamron 17-70mm f2.8 lens: This is the next best lens to get if you are looking for an all-around travel lens that can produce high-quality images and has internal optical stabilization, which is perfect for those with the Sony a6000, a6100, a6300, and a6400 which lack in-body image stabilization.. Best of all, it is half the price of the Sony 16-55mm F2.8 lens
  5. That would make it harder to use in low light without a tripod, but $300 is a good chunk of change. Alternately, the Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 SP Di VC USD XLD has a lot of letters and numbers
  6. Sigma 24-105mm f/4 Art Lens Review. Sharpness 8.7. Bokeh 7.8. Low Light Capabiliy 8. Build Quality 9. Color Rendition 9. I have a love hate relationship with zoom lenses. On one hand, I would like to have an arsenal of completely prime lenses. But I definitely cannot afford a 14, 24, 50, 85, 135, and 200mm lens lineup

Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III RXD Sony 28-75 F2.8 SAM Tamron SP 28-75mm F2.8 XR Di Tokina 28-80 F2.8 AT-X Pro Worthless in low light! Auto-Focus moves VERY SLOW! Hood is flimsy. Not a D lens. Zoom is a little stiff. The sony 24-105 3.5-4.5 had a lot of vignette on the A900. With no crop factor, more zoom is also nice - Tamron 28mm-75mm f2.8 works really well under low light conditions and also acceptable focus speed using the LA-EA4. The lens sharper centers at 75mm, F/2.8. - Sony 75-300 is extremely difficult to focus (Tungsten Lighting Indoors) under 6400 ISO at f4.5. With A65 works really well at 800-1600 ISO At present I have a Canon 50mm 1.8, a Tamron 28 - 75 and a Canon 28 - 135 IS. I've been told on a previous thread that the quality of the Canon 28 -135 is close to the kit 24 - 105. So, I'm wondering about saving a bit of money and getting the 5D MK2 body only, and, as suggested by a helpful member, sticking with the Tamron and canon lenses I.

See price on Amazon. A closer look: The Sony E 16-55mm f/2.8 G is the best lens for you if you're after the ultimate image quality. In fact, while it's much more expensive than the previously mentioned Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8, this lens is a better choice for professionals and serious amateurs.Compared to the Tamron lens, it's also 1mm longer on the wide-angle side and has more. At 180mm, the Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD Lens frames our image quality test target (it measures 47.25 x 31.5, 1200 x 800mm) at 20.24' (6.17m) vs. the Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS Lens at 200mm doing the same at 22.50' (6.86m). That means moving 2.26' (0.69m) or about 10% closer to the subject to gain the same subject framing

Even the slightly slower aperture isn't a big issue because all Sony full-frame bodies perform well in low light up to 3200, and a handful like the A7s, A7s II and A7r II perform even better. It includes optical stabilisation, a focus limiter switch and an AF/MF switch Tamron has Sony E Mount as well as Canon and Nikon mounts, allowing our photographers a variety of options suited to their needs. Our all-in-one lenses run the gamut from 18-200mm to 18-400mm offering a high degree of focal length control situated in one single package

I do a lot of low light and portraiture and events where 24-70 is very useful but find I really do not need 2.8 when the excellent 1.8 85 , 35 and 50mm primes that are super. I did a shoot tonight, portrait and boudoir session tonight and took only a SB900, the Z6, a 24-70 f/4, 85 1.8 S, and 50 1.8 S that fit in a small sling bag It is one of the Sony E-mount lens you must have. This Sony 35mm f/1.8 OSS is an ideal lens for portraits, low light, up close shots, videos and more. More Options: Sony Zeiss FE 55mm f/1.8 ($998): One of the sharpest lenses ever! Five Star! A large F1.8 maximum aperture can produce beautiful full-frame background bokeh Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM Lens. The Best All-in-one Lens for Canon EOS RP. With a high-magnification of 10x optical zoom and offering coverage from 24mm wide-angle to 240mm telephoto, the RF 24-240mm F4-6.3 IS USM is a perfect all-in-one travel lens that can be used for any number of shooting scenarios Canon 24-70mm/2.8 L II vs Zeiss 24-70/4 vs Sony 16-50 OSS 18 September 2015. Ultra-Ultrawides compared 26 March 2015 . Canon 300mm Lenses Compared October 2014. Premium 50mm lenses compared September 2014. Canon Ultrawide Lens Sharpness Comparison 16 July 2014 . Canon 10-18mm IS vs. 16-35mm f/2.8 L II 12 June 2014 . Canon 50mm Lenses Compared.

Here is the press text: TAMRON Announces Development of its First Lens for Sony E-mount The world's first 1 16.6x all-in-one zoom for APS-C mirrorless cameras. July 21, 2021, Commack, NY - Tamron Co., Ltd. announces the development of its first lens for FUJIFILM X-mount and Sony E-mount cameras simultaneously. The lenses are expected to be available in the Fall 2021 SEL1224GM. Sony FE 12-24mm F2.8 G MASTER Full-frame Constant-aperture Ultra-wide Zoom Lens. $2,899.99 $2,999.99. Add to cart. SEL100400GM. G Master FE 100-400mm super-telephoto zoom lens. $2,399.99 $2,499.99. Only 1 left in stock. Add to cart At 50 mm my 24 -105 mm is very close to image quality of the EF 50mm F/1.8. reviewed November 17th, 2006 (purchased for $1,100) 9 out of 10 points and recommended by przemekszymbra (3 reviews. The tamron_24-70/2.8vc is the first, and as far as I know only, 24-70mm f2.8 which incorporates an active image stabilization system within the lens. The nikon_24-70 and canon_24-70 are both unstabilized and even the new canon_24-70/2.8II does not have stabilization.. The Tamron AF 24-70mm f/2.8 SP Di USD VC is quite a complex design with three low dispersion (LD) elements, two high refractive.

Vlady Radev July 3, 2018 Blog No Comments Of all the lenses available on the market, there's no doubt that the Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 and Sony 24-105 f/4 are currently two of the most popular offerings among the Sony camera users Canon: Modell: RF 24-105 mm 4L IS USM: Markteinführung: September 2018: EAN: 4549292115611, 8714574659633. Nikon DX vs. Sony A7 II, 24-70/2.8 GM & 70-200/4 G Comparison Feb 2017. All 24-70mm Lenses Compared 26 January 2016. Ultra-Ultrawides compared 26 March 2015 . Premium 50mm lenses compared September 2014. Nikon 400mm f/2.8 Lenses Compared 09 July 2014. Nikon 50mm and 58mm Bokeh Comparison 11 December 2013 . Best Macro Lenses 28 June 201 Sony FE 16-35mm F/4 ZA OSS Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* vs. The New full frame E-Mount Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 Di III RXD lens is a reasonable affordable at $899 US, and lightweight at 14.82 oz / 420 grams. It's Tamrons compliment to their already now proven to be awesome 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III RXD Lens which is also fairly affordable at $879 US, and. The Tamron 16-300mm is a wide-angle telephoto lens designed for DSLR cameras with the APS-C sensor. It offers premium features like a 35mm focal range of 24-450mm, Vibration Compensation for combating blur, 39cm minimum focus distance, Piezo Drive motor, and more. It comes in different fits for various camera types, including Nikon, Sony, and.

Another Sony FE 24-105 vs

Hi All, I just picked up the Sony A73 but havent picked up a lens yet. As my first lens, Im torn between the Tamron 28-75 and the Sony 24-105. The thing is, I can get the Sony 24-105 f4 for the same price as the Tamron 28-75 due to a close friend working at Sony (employee discount). Any reason NO.. For low DOF work, it obviously goes much wider aperture, 1.4 vs. 2.8, than the tam and at f/2.8 it is quite very definitely better even near the very center of the frame, so it is a vastly better fast wide on a FF than the tamron is (even radically moreso compared to the canon 24-105). It is about the same size as the tam

Final Thoughts on the 24-105 mm f/4 G OSS . As long as you're willing to sacrifice the wideness of a lens that can go as far as 16mm, buying the 24-105mm f/4 G OSS for travel is an easy decision to make. especially on the low light heavyweight that is the Sony A7III The Tamron 70-180mm f/2.8 Di III VXD lens cuts a little bit of zoom power and drops stabilization, but costs less than half of what Sony charges for its 70-200mm F2.8 GM. MSRP $1,199.00 $1,199.0 1. Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L. If you often have to take pictures in low light, then pay attention to this model which is the best Canon lens for family photography and close-up portraits. Thanks to the widest aperture among all the lenses of this brand, you will get incredible pictures even in the poorest light Tamron APS-C E-Mount Lenses (E) Tamron offers a good quality affordable alternatives to the Sony E-Mount Lenses. These lenses are designed for the APS-C E-Mount cameras like the Sony A6600, A6500, A6400, and A6000 for example. Tamron 11-20mm f/2.8 Di III-A RXD Len

I shoot Nikon now but when I used Canon I first had the 24-105/4. because the original 24-70/2.8 was just not a very good lens and because I wanted something with IS Sony FE Standard Zoom Shootout - Sony 2.8/24-70 GM vs. Sony 4/24-105 G OSS vs. Tamron 2.8/28-75 Di III RXD - Part 1: Sharpness testing April 5, 2019 Jannik Peters 37 Comments. The Tamron 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 does lag a bit in sharpness when wide open in low light conditions but considering it's only an f/3.5-4.5, this isn't that much of a surprise. I haven't yet found a wide angle lens in this price range that doesn't have that issue - Great in low-light conditions: 6. Tamron 18-200mm f/3.5 - Variety of focal lengths - Handy all-around lens - Vibration compensation technology: 7. Sigma 16mm F/1.4 - Sharp, clean, accurate colors - Multi-coat layers to minimize lens flare - Fast focus and quiet: 8. Zhongyi 35mm f/0.95 - Lightweight - Offers increased control. Designed to appeal to those shooting sports, wildlife and action with fast cameras like the Sony a6600, the 70-350mm f/4.5-6.3G OSS super-telephoto lens is an exciting new addition to Sony's APS.

It's an ok lens. It's not so different from the canon 24-105 f/4 in terms of sharpness and general rendering. But is so much inferior in backlight situation, AF, bokeh, color rendition, toughness. The 2.8 is almost useless. A good lens if you just want to cover a simple job and you don't have so much money to start The Best Canon Lenses for 2021. When you're shopping for an interchangeable lens camera, Canon is the first name that comes to mind. But Canon has multiple mounts and sensor sizes, so it can be. In addition, the maximum aperture of f/3.5-6.3 is decent but won't get you pro-level low light performance or bokeh. However, the Tamron 16-300mm is a one-stop solution for your Canon DSLR and we prefer it over the Canon 18-200mm below. See the Tamron 16-300mm f/3.5-6.3 for Canon 5 Canon EF-S Lenses That Missed the Cut 11 What Lens to Buy: 24mm Lens. If you shoot a lot of landscapes, a 24mm prime lens is an excellent choice. Not only do these lenses give you a wide-angle view of the landscape, thus allowing you to capture more of the scene in your shot, but they have top-notch optics, too. Prime lenses typically have great glass and have fewer elements in the.

Today, Nikon has announced a new DX zoom lens for beginner photographers. Covering a vast focal length range of 18-300mm, it's not the first Nikkor with such parameters - the similar 18-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR lens has already been announced a while ago, not to mention all the third-party competition from Tamron and Sigma. However, the new lens is designed not to just deliver a very wide zoom. The addition of a semi-macro mode, like we find on this Panasonic Lumix S 24-105 mm F4 Macro OIS, makes it very much an all-round lens, and there is really only one factor that can stand in the way of the success of this lens, and that is the image quality. BUILD The Lumix S 24-105 mm F4 Macro OIS is a hefty lens

Sony 24-105 G vs Tamron 28-75 : SonyAlpha - reddi

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM. Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L lenses have been at or near the top of the wide zoom lens category for a long time, and this third version improves on the features of its predecessors. It continues to offer a fairly wide range of focal lengths and a wide f/2.8 aperture, making it a versatile option for many situations Interchangeable lenses for the Sony E-mount digital camera series with full-frame image sensors are added as members of the Art line. While offering the same high-performance optical design as other lenses in the Art line, the new E-mount models will feature a newly developed control algorithm that optimizes the autofocus drive and maximizes the data transmission speed Pros. Uses a nano-coating to resist scratches and other imperfections to the filter's surface, while also making it easier to clean. Fits numerous lens threads ranging from 30.5 mm to 86 mm. Front thread allows you to add more filters or accessories. Uses lightweight materials, so it won't hamper your photography work Autofocus is silent, almost instantaneous and always accurate. In dimmer light, the 50-140mm f/2.8 starts to struggle when compared to a dSLR 70-200mm, so low-light sports use is not advisable. By day and in good light is where this lens really sings, as shown in the excellent panning motorsports shot below

In fact that's exactly how I treat it. With the above mentioned three lenses I'm covered for image stabilized zoom from 18-105mm, have a sharp 50mm, and cinema 85mm for artistic stuff. This Sigma give me wider angles and superb low-light performance (F1.8). An instant classic. Again, no image stabilization. Keep that in mind Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS. The Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS is the most Sony prime lens, offers high-quality image quality and incredible autofocus. Most notably, the tough brass barrel, rubber grip focus ring, and generously sized switches add up to an ergonomic experience that's satisfying and feels tech-savvy At f2.8, it's fast enough to help out in low light situations as well, and at this price, it's not breaking the bank. What a deal. Find more 17-50mm f2.8 information and reviews here

Canon 1Dx version of this table - Canon version equals Tamron on sharpness and scores 27 vs 26 overall. And launch prices were $2299 vs $1299 . Note that the older Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD at $499 is a bargain if you value sharpness and don't care too much about the VC feature Tamron SP 90/2.8 VC F004. Tamron 10-24/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD B023. Tamron SP 15-30/2.8 VC A012. Tamron 16-300/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD B016. Tamron SP 17-50/2.8 XR Di-II VC LD B005. Tamron 18-400/3.5-6.3 Di II VC HLD B028. Tamron SP 24-70/2.8 Di VC USD A007. Tamron SP 24-70/2.8 Di VC USD G2 A032. Tamron SP 28-75/2.8 XR Di LD A09. Tamron SP 35-150/2. I compared this Tamron 28-75 2.8 (£750) to the G Master 24-70 2.8 (£1,800) and the Sony 24-105 4.0 (£1,200). I compared the weight, size, price, aperture, range and quality. You might find this hard to believe, but I was very close to buying the G Master, but what put me off wasn't the price, it was the size/weight DXOMARK's comprehensive camera lens test result database allows you to browse and select lenses for comparison based on their characteristics, brand, price, lens type, lens size, focal range and aperture. You can also select a camera to see the results for all the lenses tested on it. Any Brand. Canon. Nikon Go-to telephoto with exceptional speed, versatility and low-light performance. Learn More about Nikkor Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S Learn More about Nikkor Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S . Nikkor Z 58mm f/0.95 S Noct. Bokeh Beyond Belief. The fastest Nikkor lens ever. A one-of-a-kind manual focus lens with vast depth-of-field control and elaborate bokeh.